Overview
Explain how OZJF assembles claims, chooses sources, and decides when evidence is strong enough to publish.
Why This Page Matters
OZJF will separate evidence from interpretation and show its sourcing logic.
Key Points
- Primary sources matter more than recycled claims.
- Method should be visible enough that a critic can follow it.
- Polling, legal, historical, and statistical claims should each have different standards.
- Sourcing should be reproducible.
- Translation workflow should be explicit when research is published in multiple languages.
What Visitors Should Find Here
- Source hierarchy
- Verification and cross-check rules
- Standards for polling and statistics
- Standards for historical and legal claims
- Standards for human review of AI-assisted translations
- Review and sign-off process
Ways To Engage
- Read the methodology
- Browse the source library
- Flag an evidence issue